Worked Examples

circle-info

Operator & jurisdiction: BASIS is operated by BASIS DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD, a Seychelles-incorporated entity (LEI: 254900IX2F2KCWNSSS64arrow-up-right).

Currency convention: Portfolio values may be displayed in USDT as an internal accounting and reference unit for USD-equivalent reporting. USDT is not a depositable or withdrawable asset on BASIS.

Example 1, Quantity preservation vs displayed portfolio value

You deposit 1 BTC when BTC trades at 100,000 in USDT-equivalent terms.

  • You deposit BTC by sending it to your BASIS-assigned BTC address.

  • You swap to 1 stBTC at a 1:1 quantity ratio.

  • Over time, rewards accumulate in real time and your position becomes 1.10 BTC in quantity terms.

If BTC price later drops to 50,000 in USDT-equivalent terms:

  • Quantity increased: 1.00 BTC → 1.10 BTC

  • Displayed portfolio value decreased: 100,000 → 55,000

This shows:

  • BASIS is designed around preservation and growth of asset quantity

  • BASIS does not guarantee the displayed market value of the underlying asset in USDT-equivalent terms

circle-check

Example 2, Lock-up booster effect

Assume an illustrative base net yield rate for a period is 0.40%.

Under the Booster schedule, a 180D lock-up applies a +100% booster, equivalent to 2× the base rate.

Lock-up
Booster
Illustrative result on 0.40% base

14D

+10%

0.44%

30D

+20%

0.48%

90D

+50%

0.60%

180D

+100%

0.80%

Actual realized yield depends on:

  • market conditions

  • execution precision

  • structural alpha capture conditions

  • safety state behavior

  • deterministic risk controls

Example 3, Booster reset on add-stake

You stake BTC with a displayed portfolio value of 10,000 in USDT-equivalent terms under a 90D lock-up. After 30 days, you add more BTC with a displayed portfolio value of 5,000.

Under the reset policy:

  • the lock timer resets at the new add-stake timestamp

  • the aggregated staked position follows the new schedule

  • rewards continue to accumulate as stBTC in the Staking Wallet

This prevents booster gaming and preserves fairness across participants.

circle-exclamation

Example 4, Fixed pool unstaking rationale

If many users request unstaking around the same time:

  • immediate liquidation can create slippage and adverse execution

  • those effects may reduce net outcomes for remaining participants

  • a defined lock-up structure supports orderly strategy unwinds under state machine controls

For fixed pools:

  • unstaking is available only after the selected lock-up period ends

  • there is no early exit option

This framework supports deterministic execution, mathematical constraints, and consistent risk handling.


If you want to explore these mechanics further, read Risk Disclosure and Risk Model next.

Last updated